Download in PDF format*You must Register and Log in to post comments.
Voice message left on Dr. Tadros’ answering machine in June 2011 by Jan who worked as Stephen Doyne’s office manager of many years.
The voice recording says, “…Dr. Tadros I wanted to let you know, …I know you know Stephen Doyne, and I wanted to let you know that …his wife, Beth, is on the payroll every 2-weeks …for $5,000 Dollars and has never worked at his office, and also she collected unemployment while she also collected that $5,000 Dollars every 2-weeks …I just wanted to let you know that. Thank-you, bye. … To Replay Press 1, To Save Press 2, To Delete Press 3…”
The Chameleon
Hard facts about Stephen Doyne Phd specialty Diplomate
According to the Nationwide well respected Psychology Board Certified: 1- Dr. Eichel, 2- Professor of Law Carol Henderson, 3- Professor of Law James Starrs, 4- Professor of Law Andre Moenssens, 5- Mark Hansen, Attorney and publisher of the ABA, and 6- Elizabeth McDonald of the Wall Street Journal ALL confirm that for $350 dollars, Robert O’Block, who honored a Specialty Diplomate to a house cat named Zoe (which states on the certificate Zoe has a PhD), and who also granted a Specialty Diplomate to Custody Evaluator Stephen Doyne, is threatening to sue the co-founders of California Coalition for Families and Children (CCFC) with a defamation lawsuit seeking penalties of 1,000,000 Dollars. Robert O’Block is seeking to shutdown The Public Court for exposing the truth about the “cat credentialed?” Custody Evaluators – The Public Court.
If Dr. Tadros and CCFC do not keep quiet or “shut down” public exposure about Zoe the Cat getting a PhD and Diploma, they will be sued for this huge sum of money?
To the solid fact that Zoe the Cat is Dr. Tadros’s best witness, he is left with no other choice than to pursue the timely filing against Robert O’Block’s owner of the ACFE, who according to Professor carol Henderson issued a house Cat with “Diplomate (and Phd)” certificate, (read below) with the filing of Tadros MD vs. American College of Forensic Examiners International (ACFEI), dated January 10, 2011
Read the correspondence to ACFEI before Dr. Tadros filed the lawsuit.
Please note that neither Zoe the pet Cat nor Stephen Doyne have the one and only highly respected Board Certification from the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP and ABFP).
Copies of Zoe’s and Doyne’s Diplomates are further down the page.
Download: Emad Tadros/CCFC vs. American College of Forensic Examiners International (ACFEI)
Custody Evaluator Stephen Doyne PhD., with a false Diplomate (cat credentials) CONTINUES TO BE the lawyers’ and judges’ Principal Lecturer, nick named the Dean, across the State of California teaching the California Rules of Court. The Rules he personally taught, yet never followed and violated for years! Please read the Amicus. This story is shocking and will shock the nation as to WHO EXACTLY our Custody Evaluators are!
10News Story on Stephen Doyne PhD. aired July 7th and 8th, 2009.
~Beginning of ABC News I-Team Investigation statement:
Custody Evaluator’s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit
Dr. Stephen Doyne Has Been Involved In 3,000 To 4,000 San Diego Custody Cases
Lauren Reynolds
10News I-Team Reporter
POSTED: 7:10 pm PDT July 7, 2009
UPDATED: 5:27 pm PDT July 9, 2009
SAN DIEGO — Dr. Stephen Doyne, PhD, is widely used in the San Diego Family Court as a custody evaluator. His job is to advise the court on where children of divorce should live, which parent is more fit. The evaluations can be costly, both in emotion and dollars. Clients told the 10 News I-Team they paid Doyne between $5,000 and $30,000.
“A child custody evaluator has tremendous power and influence,” said Marc Angelucci. He’s an attorney representing Dr. Emad Tadros in a civil lawsuit against Dr. Doyne alleging fraud and negligence.
Dr. Tadros is Vice Chief of Scripps Behavioral Health Services. He was a client of Dr. Doyne and felt Doyne’s work was unprofessional. When Tadros researched Doyne’s credentials, he believed they were falsified and dubious.
“I think it’s a big deal to have misleading credentials, particularly when you are a child custody evaluator that the courts refer people to,” pointed out Angelucci.
While Dr. Doyne is a licensed psychologist, questions remain, for instance, the “Diplomate” title Dr. Doyne uses.
In a letter filed in court documents, Dr. Doyne signs his name and calls himself a “Diplomate of the American College of Forensic Examiners.”
The college, Angelucci says, is a “sham organizations” that “sells fake diplomas.”
“They’ve given credentials to a cat,” he said.
The cat was named Zoe. D. Katze. The American Bar Association Journal reported how the housecat was credentialed.
The I-Team called the American College of Forensic Examiners for a comment. They were told they could not have any information without the signed consent of the member they were calling about.
Dr. Doyne’s resume, also filed in court documents, lists Doyne as an Adjunct Professor at the University of San Diego Law School.
I Team Reporter Lauren Reynolds questioned Angelucci “true or false?”
His response, “From what we’ve seen, completely false.”
In court documents, U.S.D. claims no record of Dr. Doyne as a professor, searching “back to the mid-1970.”
Maureen Miller, a client of Dr. Doyne, said Doyne made another claim to her.
“He had told me that he had been a professor at U.C.S.D.”
A letter from U.C.S.D., also filed in the court file, says after “extensive research” Stephen Doyne has not been directly employed by the University of California San Diego.
In Doyne’s declaration to the court he says he worked at both universities “25 to 30 years ago” and that “nobody keeps records that long.”
We requested an interview with Dr. Doyne. His attorney, Christopher Zopatti, said his client “can’t personally respond” to our questions because of the pending lawsuit. However, he wrote, “Dr. Doyne stands by his record of education and experience.” Zopatti called the allegations against Dr. Doyne “unsubstantiated.”
John Van Dorn, a Doyne client, said “You have a certain expectation that the courts have vetted out the person they are appointing.”
Dr. Doyne is one of a dozen custody evaluators repeatedly used by San Diego Family Court. The court had no response to the allegations against Dr. Doyne. The court also clarified that it does not verify the professional licenses or the resumes of the custody evaluators.
~End of ABC News I-Team Investigation statement.
Custody Evaluator Stephen Doyne PhD. – Title Switching, Deception, Fraud and Lies on Resume…
The signatures are actual signatures taken from correspondence from Custody Evaluator Stephen Doyne to his clients.
Zoe D. Katze means Zoe the Cat!
Read about Zoe below but also be sure and read:The Print, Vol. 16, by Mark Hansen
Keep reading it gets even better and more intriguing!
Carol Henderson writes about “cancerous” Diploma Mills, Mark Hansen, Robert O’Block’s ACFE (Doyne’s Diplomate), and Dr. Steven Eichel and his credentialed pet cat Zoe. Among her other achievements below, she is a Fellow of and has served as Chairman of the highly respected American Academy of Forensic Sciences AAFS.
Zoe the cat’s Diplomate
According to the article in THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: “The Making of the Expert Witness: It’s in the Credentials,” by Elizabeth McDonald. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition). New York, N.Y., Feb 8, 1999; pg. B1., Dr. Robert O’Block taught Criminal justice for about 10 years, beginning in the early 1980, at the Appalachian State University in Boone, but the school dismissed him in May 1991 for allegedly plagiarizing academic articles on such articles as Crime and Criminal Sentences…
According to Attorney Mark Hansen Writer for the ABA Journal with his Article “Expertise-To-Go,” published in the ABA’s website www.abanet.org/journal/02FPERT.html on February 12, 2000. Mark Hansen writes, “But O’Block, 48, apparently has made few friends and admirers along the way. One former associate calls him a con artist. And more than one describes his organization’s credentialing process as a complete scam.”
“He basically takes people’s money and gives them a worthless piece of paper,” says Robert Phillips, an Audubon, N.J., document examiner. “He’s just in it for the money.” Phillips claims he has reason to know. He says he resigned as chair of the organization’s certification committee in 1993 after discovering that O’Block was issuing credentials to unqualified candidates behind the committee’s back. Many of the nation’s leading forensic scientists don’t seem to have much use for O’Block or his organization either. James Starrs, a professor of law and forensic sciences at George Washington University, says the organization’s certification process lacks objectivity. “It’s driven by the felt needs of the people in charge,” he says. “If they want you in, you’re in, even if they have to break all of the rules to do it.” Andre Moenssens, a law school professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and an expert on scientific evidence, goes even further. He says O’Block’s organization is basically a certification mill. “For the right amount of money, he will certify just about anybody as an expert in anything,” Moenssens says.
The well respected and well qualified Dr. Steven Eichel, Real Board Certified by the American Board of Professional Psychology/ABPP and owner of the cat or Dr. Zoe De Katze, the cat who honorably received her Specialty Diplomate & PHD Certificate from ACFE states that he had to quit working for the ACFE when he realized that its board certifying people did not have licenses or graduate degrees.
ABC’s 10News I-team investigation (investigating the Bogus Credentials Fraud of Stephen Doyne) and the investigator team of the second bogus Steven Feldman Phd/Saratoga County news release stated that O’Block would not cooperate or return phone calls or any inquiries about Stephen Doyne or Feldman Diplomates that were issued by O’block’s entity. The same goes where Dr. Tadros was never allowed to know anything about the Credential Fraud Con Artist Stephen Doyne.
In her chapter section in the book, Scientific Evidence Review, on page 7-8, Professor of Law Carol Henderson, past president of American Academy of Forensic Sciences, cites the Wall Street Journal Article, the making of the expert witness, she writes, “The founder of the ACFE has been attempting to establish an internet based educational program. So far no college of University has decided to host the program.”
An internet search of the US Department of Education and Distance Education revealed no presence of ACFE at both entities. We the public have the right to know how and whom does O’Block honor such specialty Diplomates to? THIS IS OUR PUBLIC RIGHT AND O’BLOCK MUST NOT STRIP THIS AWAY FROM US. We do urge and make a public request for Mr. O’ Block to make any corrections to this serious fact, instead of wasting our time with his lawsuit threats.
Google: “Angiemedia Stephen Doyne files” where you will see for yourselves at least 14 different boards and the ACFE, all from the same location of a 2508 square foot property, with the same phone number, same owner, Robert O’Block.
Stephen Doyne’s ACFE Diplomate.
On the emblem bottom left it reads across the top ribbon, “A LOYAL AND TRUSTWORTHY MEMBER,” and on the bottom ribbon it reads, “SCIENCE • INTEGRITY • JUSTICE.” In the circle it reads, “AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FORENSIC EXAMINERS” – ACFEI.
EXHIBIT#1:
1- December 20, 2007 letter from 2750 East Sunshine-Springfield MO from the American Board of Professional Counselors declares being a subsidiary of the American Psychotherapy Association/APA. It confirms a professionally looking letter to Dear Emad but not to Dr. Tadros with the MD title. This logically conveys that the solicitor had no clue what professional type he was granting this solicitation letter to? This also gives simple understanding as to how and why “Zoe De Katze” was granted “Diplomate & PHD” from the same address.
2- Offered in this same letter is a grandfathering of Diploma being granted to Tadros and how it would be looking as a Beautiful Certificate, suitable for framing, which is never the professional language of the well respected APA, misleading the average public. This is a needed Public Awareness and Public Trust issue.
3- On the accompanying first page of the application there is no checking of any credentials. It is only a “Self-Claimed” Point System. (Again that is how Zoe the cat got Diploma & Ph.D.) On this same first application page, APA offers its selling by declaring a statement to the buyers in the very small bottom box: “..I may be asked to provide additional documentation…” If I would misrepresent my credentials, refuse to provide documentation at a later time if asked. The Solicitor minimizes checking one’s credentials in a barely readable print. Why such a seriously pivotal piece of information is in a very small, barely readable print? This matter is a needed Public Awareness and Serious Public Trust. 
4- The last page of application offers a life time membership for $2500 and special discounts if the buyer purchased more than one item which is never the practice for any well respected organization. The public needs to know how such so called Specialty Diplomate(s) obtain their life time membership for a one time fee of $2500, and how they get grandfathered Diplomate(s) for ~$350. This is especially serious when the owner of the Diploma Mill does not follow common public procedure and instead he refuses to let the public know anything about how those so-called Honored Diplomates obtained their credentials from his entity.
Doyne challenged the Cat Diplomate issued by The Board of Professional Counselors, a subsidiary of American Psychotherapy Association/APA (and counterfeit APA of the well respected American Psychological Association) by replying that Tadros could not prove that Doyne’s Diplomate was being issued from the same location where the cat received hers. However the address on this letter is the same where the Cat Diploma & PHD came from and is the exact same location for The American College of Forensic Examiners, where Doyne obtained his Forensic Specialty Diplomate Certificate (AA vol.5 p.1329 to 1343), 2750 East Sunshine, Springfield MO 65804.
Stephen Doyne does not have a real bonified Board Certification like from the AAFP.
Page five (5) of Custody Evaluator Stephen Doyne’s CV
42 comments
No ping yet
KRISTIN HANSON says:
January 4, 2011 at 3:12 am (UTC -7)
PLEASE STOP COURT ORDERED CHILD ABUSE AND ABUSE OF POWER BY JUDGES, LAWYERS, CPS WORKERS, ETC.
THEY ARE DESTROYING FAMILIES FOR MONEY AND SEPARATING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOR $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. THE CORRUPTION MUST END!!!!!!!
Ingrid Blank says:
January 16, 2011 at 12:44 pm (UTC -7)
This is rather urgent! Can anybody shed some light about the credentials, qualifications, if any, of this so-called mediator/evaluator, claiming that she has an “M.S.”.
Tiffany Tsai
Court Mediator Evaluator
Southwest Justice Center
30755 Auld Road, Ste. 1226
Murrieta, CA 92562
(951) 304-5174
Tiffany.Bradbury@riverside.courts.ca.gov
She doesn’t seem to have been licensed by any of the boards.
if you have any information or experience with this lady , please send it to enb1@telkomsa.net
Admin says:
January 16, 2011 at 1:42 pm (UTC -7)
Ingrid,
Many of your answers can be found at this webpage. If you carefully read and analyze the above evidence by Dr. Tadros you will clue in what you would need to do. First rule is to only communicate in writing, certified/return receipt or fax with some date/time stamp of confirmation of successful transmission. In other words create a very careful paper trail. No response can be a good response as evidence. Any truly qualified, Board certified professional will practically be running to the copy machine to share their CV with you. If they are not then you should be highly suspect and strictly pursue communications such as Dr. Tadros did with ding-dong Doyne.
The Board of Psychology or Board of Behavioral Sciences are part of the “fox in the henhouse” problems the Public is having with these mediator/evaluators. There is no accountability and they tend to protect them rather than hold them accountable or take licenses away.
The Courts are not doing a good job at vetting these professionals if at all. In San Diego County they absolutely do not vet them, the local court rules there even say it is the litigants responsibility to verify credentials. Credentials are degrees, certifications, etc. Qualifications are the mandatory Rules of Court CRC 5.220 – 5.230 Title 5 for custody evaluators. There are rules for Mediators in Title 5 too. They outline the qualifications. Credentials are something that the Board of Psychology/Behavioral Science requires for licensure (their college degrees), and that is also outlined by the Family Code for evaluators/mediators. The Family Code is mentioned in CRC Title 5.
Problems that the public are having are that they are getting the run-around from the BoP and BoBS in getting information as to how these mediator/evaluator types have gotten their licenses in the first place. These Boards are not being cooperative and again tend to protect their own – sad and true. What the Board of Psychology did with Orange County Evaluator Steven Adam is slap him on the wrist with a $250 dollar fine for doing work without a valid license.
The Court says it is the litigants responsibility to vet.
The mediator/evaluators are not compliant or forthright in providing their credentials and even qualifications, and they should be, and yet the Court isn’t even doing anything about them not coming up with them. The Court is also protecting these mediator/evaluators, they give them judicial immunity and do not support the efforts of litigants trying to vet them on their own! Totally corrupt!!!
Again, there is no accountability.
However, creating a paper trail of corrupt responses or no response at all is the best way to create accountability. If you do what Dr. Tadros has done then you can join in the ranks of the public that will create a class action lawsuit or Federal RICO lawsuit against those that should be holding them accountable. Get it? Document, document, document!
Eileen Lasher says:
January 17, 2011 at 6:01 pm (UTC -7)
I am dating myself but I remember the commercials when I was a kid about the cool toys and when you got sucked in and bought the toy when you brought it home it was quite a bit smaller than it looked on T.V.
I believe advertising had to be modified as a result.
Please keep in mind it is my position that we have nothing against the diploma mill and its ability to make a lot of money. Our contention is to accurately explain that objects are a lot smaller than they appear. San Diego Family Court needs to make it very clear that the experts may have purchased his/her diploma from a mill or even obtained it from a cracker jack box.
The real issue is why is everyone so mad they have been outed. It is also my position that the film shown prior to going into FCS says you will be divorced in 6 mos and have close and continous contact with your children. False advertising. I certainly did not get the toy I paid for. That is what the issue is.
I am in the business of buying and selling precious metals. Prior to buying gold, silver, platinum or palladium I have to go over with the client that they fully understand we did not guarantee they would make a profit. Prior to that the clearing firm has to make sure that if the client loses money with an investment they will not end up homeless. Complying that everyone understands what it is they are getting themselves into.
Family Court should be like that otherwise they should not be conducting business. Period. Prior to taking our money the attorneys should have to fully explain what it is that could happen. What it is they are going to do. Period.
Emad Tadros MD and The Public At Large says:
January 19, 2011 at 8:41 pm (UTC -7)
The one Million Dollar lawsuit threat is alive if we do not shut down this thepubliccourt.com site. Please USmail the Amicus signature page only or attac it tom email. Let the the frauds read your professional opinion with no swearing please. We are to be respectful at all times and regardless. It is who we are being real professionals and we do not want to be a fake symbol of who they are. Every single public support is needed. Thank you.
TadrosMD@pol.net
Emad Tadros and the Habitually Cheated and Frustrated San Diego families and Children says:
January 23, 2011 at 1:28 am (UTC -7)
http://home.comcast.net/~slgolding/publications/expert_voir_dire.htm
Silvia wilson says:
January 31, 2011 at 4:42 am (UTC -7)
I have saved the contents of this page, in case you are forced to take the page down. Glad to see your thorough investigation of this shady character. Let us not allow these diploma mills to continue foisting their deceptions on the courts.
Best wishes!
Sally P. says:
December 7, 2011 at 6:38 am (UTC -7)
All I know is you’re on the right track. The best is yet to come. It is all one big hoax!
The Mandatory Gov. Code 87200 says:
February 4, 2011 at 8:57 pm (UTC -7)
The Bogus Propaganda Credentials Court Experts, including their Fraud smooth Boss, Stephen Doyne keep chewing on their gum: “Angry Parents!”
By saying this, it becomes their wall where they hide with their false misleading credentials and use them as their launchpad to committ Perjury and Fraud on the Public!
DO the judges also appreciate such scientific misrepresentations and not move an inch on this one too?
Honorable Judges : What about the above substantiated and concrete findings where now the attorneys find themselves wide open for Malpractice county-wide and have to “cough-up” the monies that they collected illegaly and give it back to the San Diego County families?
Are any of you to protect the public or own best interest?
Are you still going to accept Election Campaign Funds but would not report them as the law mandates and according to the Mandatory Gov. Code 87200?
Litigants Behaving Badly
Eileen Lasher says:
February 17, 2011 at 10:42 pm (UTC -7)
My former attorney William Blatchley did not prepare or file Orders in a timely fashion.
Orders are to be prepared within 60 days to allow the litigant an opportunity to appeal the Order.
By failing to prepare the Order at all also denies the litigant their right to the appeal.
What is interesting is William Blatchley has a pattern of failing to prepare the Order but take the issue to appeal, bill the client, fail to argue the appeal which is a violation of judicial procedure. I have learned that my case is not the only case he has failed to practice his required due diligence. There are several women in San Diego who have contacted me who have been harmed by William Blatchley their own attorney.
On January 20, 2011 I attended the Public Hearing in Los Angeles which was ordered by the California Legislature. They have ordered the California State Bar to ensure that the attorneys make public protection their primary role as it has been determined the attorneys in California have made their own interests their primary role.
The California legislature has ordered the California State Bar to come up with accountability and regulations to ensure this does not continue. The Governance Task Force has been created within the Bar to accomplish this. If the California Bar does not come up with acceptable remedies the California legislature will do it for them.
It is clear the problems in the Court system has reached critical mass and the State’s attention.
Emad Tadros MD says:
March 8, 2011 at 1:26 am (UTC -7)
For those of you who are wondering about some hiatus… I have been too busy preparing the Appeal and chasing the cat over the lawsuit that was filed accusing its 2500 square foot home of Interstate and Wire Fraud. The charges are Serious.
I assure the public that we will NOT walk away from this and we are charged on our mission to expose the frauds further and IT IS A MATTER OF TIME. The Frauds will realize that we are committed to act in the most professional way.
joan says:
July 15, 2011 at 4:14 am (UTC -7)
Congratulations on fighting the system. Keep up the fight.
Eldon "Ray" Blumhorst says:
August 29, 2011 at 10:46 pm (UTC -7)
As you say, “Expose the truth.”
Fan of Truth and Justice, and the American Way says:
September 28, 2011 at 3:43 am (UTC -7)
For those who have been dragged through the family court nightmare in San Diego and beyond,
For those who have had the great DISpleasure of dumping their hard earned money into the Scum-Fraudulent so-called “therapists” in this town–
Dr. Emad Tadros has fully exposed the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
The sad reality is that the San Diego court system can not handle the truth.
Shame on Sacramento for not having audited San Diego Family courts
Litigants Behaving Badly says:
November 30, 2011 at 3:52 am (UTC -7)
It is now confirmed that Jan < Stephen Office Manager of many years is the one who left the audio message about Stephen Doyne stealing fro the IRS and EDD.
TO listen to this message please click on the Corruption link and then click on Stephen Doyne Tax Fraud and click on Play.
Stephen Doyne is a Known Judicial Election Campaign Fund Donor.
http://www.thepubliccourt.com/corruption-2/dr-stephen-doyne-tax-fraud
LITIGANTS BEHAVING BADLY.
Emad Tadros MD says:
December 2, 2011 at 11:59 pm (UTC -7)
This is my clarification and updates to some recent public inquiries:
The case is currently at the Appellate Court Fourth District – Division One –
Facts:
1- I informed the San Diego Superior Court that its attitude and mannerisms were Atrocious and Violating my Civil Rights and flat out closing all doors refusing discovery of any of Doyne’s Fraudulent Credentials.
2- I will never give up my right to know how the Fraud Stephen Doyne, phd obtained his Specialty Diplomate form “The American College of Forensic Examiners Institute/ACFEI.”
3- Neither such privately owned Cat College Diploma Mill nor Doyne or any of San Diego judges till this very minute would ever allow discovery about Doyne’s Credentials and or substantiate Doyne’s claims on his Bogus CV. This is ALL done for reason.
4- It is as clear as the sun that the San Diego Court has been violating Mandatory California Rules of the Court from 2005 till 2009 by ignoring the Mandatory FL326. FL326 is the one and only Doyne’s obligation to divulge who he was legally and experience wise. Please read SD Court Corruption as above.
5- By not filling out and filing those Pivotal FL326 forms as the law mandated placed the Fraud Doyne as Interloper and Impostor and legally unauthorized con artist on both the SD Judiciary and the Families. This Illegal behavior also puts on the table the question of Felony Tax Evasion on both the state and Federal Levels committed by SD Evaluators…. at minimum.
6- SD court hand-in-hand with Doyne are collaborating their extra effort to cover up the Fraud Stephen Doyne and at the the court order I had to pay in full the Fraud Doyne $86,135.95 in full in attorney fees as above. This order took place while in fact we never gone to trial “YET” but the court still makes sure to hide and never allow any discovery of their very “SOCIALLY” connected Fraud Doyne.
7- This money was already paid in the absence of allowing any discovery and the claimed specialty college consistently and flat out refuses to give me any data about their Doyne obtained his Fake Diplomate form this ACFEI. ACFEI issued a Diplomate and PHD Certifcate to a house cat and the business address ACFEI mailed to an inmate another Diplomate,….. was the state prison!
8- The current Situation sits where the violated parents never received any remedy to the violations committed by Doyne & Associates. Parents are still stripped off their rights to know anything about Doyne’s and similar(s) Credentials. More over must only pay such Doyne Fraud who is a Judicial Campaign donor, tens of thousands of $$ for daring to take the Fraud Doyne to
open Court and ask the Court do its job. This is very much in the state of CA we live in 2011.
9- My own money has been recently stolen from me and my son. I assure the public that there is enough tenacity and fervor to bring my stolen property back from this Fraud Doyne & Associates and …… IT IS A MATTER OF TIME.
10- I have to be only respectful as I go up the ladder and I am currently at the Appeal Court asking for a Trial that was rejected by the lower court!
11- The Fraud Doyne has created his own website drstephendoyne.com as usual, trying to bluff and mislead the public that this case is thrown out and that he was proven innocent. A: We have never gone to trial YET. B: The money I had to pay was attorney fees that will be paid back to me as soon as I am granted a Trial.
12- It has been confirmed to me that the person who left the PLAY message is Jan Doyne’s Office Manager of may years. In addition to her findings of Doyne stealing from the IRS and EDD, she also confirmed that Doyne generates Bogus billing claims.
Good Luck to San Diego County.
.
Emad Tadros, M.D.
Diplomate American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.
Emad Tadros MD says:
December 10, 2011 at 6:30 am (UTC -7)
Yes, while I am being a well credentialed and law abiding citizen never allowed to know anything about Doyne’s Credentials or legality, I am only obligated at the
“Court-Order” to pay Doyne $86,135.95, if I asked to substantiate Doyne’s legality or credentials. This is the stage that we have reached to.
Emad Tadros, M.D.
Diplomate American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.
San Diego Superior Court Expert Witness since 1993.
Steve Wilner says:
December 15, 2011 at 10:27 pm (UTC -7)
I am very interested that if there is a fraud and it can be exposed it should. I can’t believe a cat got a PHD? Then one would assume that if Doyne, had a similar degree that is could be from a fraud rather than a real accredited organization? What I have witnessed is Dr. Emad Tadros has discovered some terrible things in family law court. I have seen personally the damages that can and do occur, I hope this leads to really about the best interests of the children, rather than all about the money, when a Judge’s wife can get $8,000 for SUPPOSEDLY helping my children, and did little or nothing in that regard and the results today are obvious too. I will accept and acknowledge my faults on this, but at one point I told Bill Blatchley, my ex-wife could have EVERYTHING at that point, but HE could not make another dollar off my family and I was to see my kids( the pawns in the battle) – ended on him attacking me in the courtroom lobby and that is part of the story……….PLEASE lead Mr. Tadros to justice and expose the truth!!! What I have seen, is a cover-up and retribution to Dr. Tadros? I can’t believe the Judge did not recuse herself? Finding and seeing the truth would be satisfying and instead of a million dollar lawsuit POSTING HERE THEIR SIDE would make more sense? This is a public forum and the truth generally will come out? The cat speaks volumes to me, what about you? I will listen to both sides.
Emad Tadros MD says:
December 27, 2011 at 6:43 am (UTC -7)
D: I am impressed with your tenacity and diligence both clearly crystallizing the truth and uncovering such deception and unethical behavior. Such Monitors being allowed to explore the details of your private life and should simply “Lead By Example.” She did not. Did the sitting judge on your case say anything?
YOU PROVED THAT: “THE TRUTH IS THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPON.”
You need to use this very weapon hand in hand with your step by step microscopic diligence and up the ladder with your next move to the California Judicial Council/CJC which established rule 5.20-Monitors requirement. Unless you do this, what happened to you will only keep happening again and again to the next blindly trusting parents!
Good luck,
Emad Tadros, M.D.
Admin says:
December 27, 2011 at 3:47 pm (UTC -7)
D,
Please post as soon as you know of the date in January so that the Public can have the opportunity to know when and where to show support!
Please also make it known who this Supervision Monitor is. The Public needs to know. The Court is saying it is the Public’s responsibility so please share who this person so that the Public can make better decisions.
Admin says:
February 18, 2012 at 6:42 am (UTC -7)
The appellate decision does NOT say Doyne did nothing wrong. It said he is immune from liability based on litigation privilege, Period. A lie is a lie and there is no two ways about it. Universities’ letters denied ever hired Doyne with diligent research back to the 70s after they checked long and hard all digital and manual records. Doyne’s CV says he taught there, but he himself can’t produce anything proving such. Well-respected custody evaluator Stephen Doyne in the San Diego court system gained that respect by “Lying.” Very few want to face up to that. That Matters.
Doyne’s teaching does relate to his qualifications as an evaluator. Corner stone here is Doyne’s Honesty and Character. If he lies on his CV, that is called “Dishonesty.” That’s serious. Someone who has gained the trust of the courts and the system through dishonesty, falsely claiming he taught at universities where evidence shows he did not. That Matters.
Not a single Discovery was ever allowed. WHY? It does not absolve Dr. Doyne of the allegations that Doyne uses false credentials in his CV. Doyne does, and ABC News & I team Investigation exposed him http://www.10news.com/news/19985926/detail.html
Doyne’s CV states he was an Adjunct Professor at the University of San Diego School of Law. But USD denies in writing having any record of Doyne, and USD’s Office of the VP and the Provost states in a letter that although she has been able to find records for any full or part time faculty member she is asked about since 1972, she found no record of Doyne even after checking with the Dean’s office of the law school and asking several faculty members, one of whom was there since 1967 and does not remember a Stephen Doyne.
Doyne’s CV states he was an Instructor at UCSD. But UCSD searched their payroll records and found Doyne “has NOT been directly employed by UCSD. In his defense, Dr. Doyne produced a weekend seminar catalogue saying he taught a one-day seminar at one of the universities (that makes him an “instructor” at that university?), and produced a declaration from a professor who remembers Dr. Doyne taking his class with the intent to later teach the class. That is all. He did not produce a single person who remembered him teaching at these universities. No student, professor, staff member, payroll record, nothing, or anything. The letters from the universities, which deny any record of him, go back to the 70s, so his claim that “nobody keeps records that long” is simply not true. Had he taught in the 70s he could come up with at least a student or staffer or any tangible evidence. Doyne had nothing.
Although Doyne is a psychologist, he apparently is not REAL board certified and instead he misleads with a diploma mill “diplomate” credentials that are sold on the internet by Robert O’Block, who the American Bar Association Journal documented has sold psychotherapist credentials to a cat named “Zoe” when the cat’s owner applied using the name “Zoe D. Katz” and mailed another one to inmate in Prison. From the very same address you can purchase these “credentials” in almost every field of science. You can see these here at http://www.thepubliccourt.com/14-board-exhibits/
Doyne is hidden behind the litigation privilege, but that changes NOTHING. “A Lie Is A Lie”
Best Wishes to San Diego Public.
Brenda B says:
February 19, 2012 at 9:55 pm (UTC -7)
“I really don’t know what to say.. Thank you for your support and your kindness. You are a true hero Emad! With such a huge purpose. God sent only the strongest person to do his work. You have the single most important element on your side and that is TRUTH. The other things which are on your side are humanities, purpose ,and protecting those to damaged weak and young to protect themselves.. You are chosen… I’m certain of this. Only one in over 100 million is brave and selfless enough to take on such an important humanities effort to help others.”
A concerned San Diego Parent Who has been personally harmed by this injustice.
Emad Tadros MD says:
February 20, 2012 at 3:24 am (UTC -7)
Dear Inquiring Public:
Public fraud should not be taken lightly or concealed by misapplying anti-SLAPP statutes. Doyne fought vehemently to avoid disclosing his CV and is still trying to conceal his fraud. But the cat is out of the bag. Channel 10 News investigated and exposed his false academic claims in his CV and his use of credentials that he purchased from a diploma mill to cover up for his lack of certification with the American Board of Professional Psychology, the only national board accepted by the American Psychological Association. To some extent, even the honorable courts may not want this exposed, as it might reveal how Doyne misled them, how they recommended him to litigants, and how they failed to require evaluators to file state-mandated FL326 forms.
Regardless, anti-SLAPP laws cannot protect Doyne, because his acts were illegal. His false credentials violated California Rules of Court 5.220(H)(2) and (5), Business and Professions Code Section 2960(n), Local Family Law Rule 5.10.5, and the confidentiality agreement, thus predicating an Unfair Competition Act claim, which is exempt from anti-SLAPP laws.
Specifically, in his CV, Doyne stated he was an “Adjunct Professor” at the University of San Diego School of Law/USD. But USD wrote a letter to Tadros (AA Vol. 8 p. 2004-2005) denying any record of Doyne and that although they could find records for any full or part time faculty member they searched for since 1972, they found no record of Doyne even after checking with the Dean’s office of the law school and asking several faculty members, one of whom was there since 1967. Had Doyne taught at USD, he could easily look up former students through the State Bar and contact them for statements. There would be a record. But all he produced was a declaration by a professor who remembers Doyne taking that professor’s class as a student for the purpose of later teaching, and Doyne’s attorney called that “proof” Doyne taught at USD. How can this a PROOF?
Clearly, this was sufficient enough for a reasonable jury to find Doyne committed a “dishonest, corrupt or fraudulent act” as a licensed psychologist in violation of Business and Professions Code Section 2960(n), making it illegal and exempt from anti-SLAPP statutes. If there was doubt, then Dr. Tadros’ request for discovery should have been granted. Doyne also stated in his CV that he was once an Instructor at the University of California at San Diego (“UCSD”). But UCSD stated in a letter to Tadros (AA Vol. 8, p. 2006) that they searched their records and found Doyne “has not been directly employed by [UCSD].” In response, Doyne produced a catalogue stating he taught a one-day seminar on a weekend at UCSD. If true, would that make him a UCSD Instructor?
Should not this issue be taken seriously and examined further? Doyne is deciding child custody cases and there is evidence he is lying about his credentials and falsely elevating the public trust. That is illegal as a a matter of law and should not be covered up. Last decision made by our courts is Both the Appellate Court and San Diego Superior Court (not the Supreme) mutually agreed that it is acceptable that Doyne’s appointment would be in violation of California Mandatory Rules of court/CRC 5.225 FL326, not ro serve FL326 as mandated on the San Diego parents and Doyne to file such forms in violation of CRC under the penalty of perjury. Please examine the concrete evidence under CA Bar Complaint and Stephen Doyne Tax Fraud.
I do appreciate the many sincere and supportive phone calls. This is the plain good honest TRUTH and that is what counts.
Thank you
Emad Tadros M.D.
Board Certified, Diplomate American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.
San Diego Superior Expert Witness since 1993
Emad Tadros, M.D. says:
February 28, 2012 at 3:49 am (UTC -7)
“Honesty and Character.”
This is my clarification to the Public Inquiry: Facts: Stephen Doyne has been misleading the public, judges and attorneys that he was honored 1- specialty certification in the forensic field, 2- taught at universities and 3- being appointed as adjunct professor at the USD school of law. This dishonesty has carried Doyne far in San Diego County. That is it. Stephen Doyne phd became prominent by “Lying.” The evidence is proven solid on the http://www.thepubliccourt.com
As usual Doyne continues to mislead the public by stating the Appellate court validates his credentials! Doyne only relies on public naivity to believe this nonsense. This is one more solid proof that Doyne is not willing to give up misleading the public.
The appellate decision is no where stating that any of Doyne’s Credentials are valid. The appellate decision only affirmed the lower court decision that no discovery will ever be allowed to investigate Doyne’s Credentials, period! This is the plain truth that Doyne tries hard to hide and color it differently misleading the public. Winning for Doyne was to simply conceal any substantiation of Doyne’s credentials or as to how Doyne obtained any such credentials when all reliable university sources deny Doyne’s existence. Such denial of Discovery now protects Doyne not to go to trial. That is it. In layman terms The Appellate court is saying that because Doyne submitted work to the court, Doyne can simply violate Mandatory Rules of Court, lie and cheat on his Resume. As simple as that.
Last decision made by both the Appellate and San Diego Superior Courts is mutually agreed that it is ACCEPTABLE that Doyne’s appointment would be in violation of Mandatory California Rules of court/CRC 5.225 FL326, Deprive the San Diego County parents their rights for Due-Process not serving FL326 as mandated on the San Diego parents and for Doyne to sign and file FL326 fraudulently under the penalty of perjury. Please examine the concrete evidence here under CA Bar Complaint and Stephen Doyne Tax Fraud.
The court said Doyne is immune from liability based on litigation privilege, Period. Corner stone here is Doyne’s “Honesty and Character.” If he makes such serious lies on his CV, that is called “DISHONESTY.” Someone who has gained the trust of the courts and the system through dishonesty, falsely claiming he taught at universities where evidence shows he never did. That Matters.
Thank you,
Emad Tadros M.D.
Eileen Lasher says:
March 26, 2012 at 7:42 am (UTC -7)
Psyhological warfare is being used by attorneys and evaluators in San Diego Family Law Court for their own financial interest. The average American does not have access to speedy justice in San Diego Family Law Court. The average American is skip traced by their own attorney and the opposing attorney who work in collusion to churn the case to seize assets. These high pressure sales tactics have no place in a government funded court system. I have requested that Damon Mosler of the San diego District Attorney’s office to investigate this unregulated boiler room operating within Sa Dieg Family Law Court. Even my son Danny was given an appointment with Damon Mosler 3 weeks ago as he did not receive his mandatory child support as a result of false documents prepared by Dave Schulman, Esq. Damon Mosler advised as long as they can get away with it there is nothing he can do. Falsifying court documents and records is illegal. Deceiving Court records is illegal. Delaying resolution is illegal. All of these high pressure sales tactics have no place in family court. The average American is no match for the sophisticated con game.
Laura Lynn says:
April 5, 2012 at 3:47 pm (UTC -7)
Dear Dr. Tadros,
A small step toward good news…The CJP issued a decision and order to admonish publicly Commissioner Alan Friedenthal who presided over my case. Here is the link to their site. I am “LL” in one of the cases referred to.
http://www.cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/public_admon/Friedenthal_DO_4-3-12.pdf
REAL CSI SERIES says:
April 16, 2012 at 5:52 pm (UTC -7)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/press-release-10/
The American College of Forensic Examiners International
Emad Tadros MD says:
April 17, 2012 at 10:37 pm (UTC -7)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/real-csi/
Ben S. says:
April 18, 2012 at 5:46 pm (UTC -7)
Excerpts from: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/no-forensic-background-no-problem/
“It’s designed to make somebody feel good, to make them feel they’ve accomplished something, and I would hope they have,” Wecht said in an interview. “Does it really qualify them to be the expert in a particular field? No.” — Cyril Wecht
So why does Stephen Doyne and David Green put it on their letterhead and business cards? For fun? Whoopee, see what I achieved, it makes me feel good!?
“…emphasized that the group’s program is mostly about fostering enthusiasm for the field…
The purpose of the organization is to encourage people who are interested in forensic science to learn more, to study more,” — Cyril Wecht
Really, so why is Stephen Doyne putting it on his letterhead, so he can share in this “bubble-gum” spirit of learn more, study more? Or is he really bluffing the Public and the Judges?
“There are certifiers, but it’s not what you and I are talking about — that is, real certification programs that train, give serious tests and will revoke your license and affect your job and ability to testify in the event that you do something wrong or fail,” Edwards said in an interview. “That doesn’t exist now.” — Judge Harry T. Edwards
Not even San Diego Superior Court will take this stuff seriously, but they do when the Custody Evalutor presides on the case and the Judge is making a decision based on what they report. This is when they take it seriously. When you go to challenge the Evaluator, they are protected carte blance by the Judges, and even the State Board of Psychology.
“Congratulate Leah for passing the CFC,” he wrote in an August 2011 email. “That course was designed as entry level to educate professionals about the justice system.” — Robert O’Block
Entry level? Try telling that to Stephen Doyne who has proudly used it under his signatures on all his letterhead, and on his wall in his office, all to bluff the naive Public and Judges!
Bartos writes, “Wecht said he doubted that having the certificate on my resume would be enough to persuade a court to allow me to give expert testimony. Any decent lawyer, he said, could easily cast doubt upon my qualifications.”
The lawyers don’t cast doubt on the experts, they cast doubt on the litigants. They work with the Evaluators and protect them. In the Family Court there are very few decent lawyers, if any, who would fight hard to expose a FRAUDULENT Custody Evaluator. The Custody Evaluators are treated like “God,” next to the Judges, with apparently more immunity protections than anyone. The Litigants have a certain expectation that the Court has already done its job of making sure that the Evaluators are vetted, safe for the Public, but that’s not the case, at least here in California.
“A kid right out of law school would say, ‘Ma’am, just exactly what is your training?” Wecht said. “The point I’m making, you see, is that that piece of paper doesn’t mean that much.”
Well the piece of paper means a whole lot to people like Stephen Doyne and San Diego Superior Court who make life changing decisions over parent and child relationships in the Family Court! These people, Wecht and O’Block are irresponsible liars, out of touch with reality… charlatans just like Stephen Doyne. My respect for O’Block and Wecht hits rock bottom with what they have to say in this truth-telling article by Leah Bartos.
tom says:
April 18, 2012 at 9:56 pm (UTC -7)
And what about Exhibit #1 mentioned above here on the letter to Emad Tadros dated December 20, 2007 sent from the same 2750 E Sunshine Address owned by O’block. Item # 2 of that letter it invites that for some CC payment A BEAUTIFUL CERTIFICATE SUITABLE FOR FRAMING WHICH RECOGNIZES YOUR STATUS……
Dr. Wecht..: Any layman would logically expect that doctors like yourself would be able to rise up to the level of respecting others’ IQ, rather than being impaired and unable to read the public.
Elena Gross says:
April 26, 2012 at 6:49 pm (UTC -7)
Hello everyone,
Someone suggested that I post here. Please support the two petitions that call for change. The UN petition has received over 700,000 like clicks on facebook but obviously that is not going to make an impression without the equivalent amount of signatures.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/252/574/035/stop-the-human-rights-abuses-in-the-us-family-court-system/
http://www.change.org/petitions/california-state-auditor-forensic-audit-judge-dale-wells-riverside-superior-court
Elena
Thank you
Eileen Lasher says:
May 22, 2012 at 7:17 am (UTC -7)
Dr. Doyne is an illegal tool used by the attorneys in San Diego Family Law Court to illegally seize the assets of unsuspecting litigants. Family Court Services receives fees in order to allow this illegal activity to continue. I have encouraged Damon Mosler of the san Diego District Attorney’s Fraud Division to examine this illegal process and at the very least require a warning be issued to Family Law litigants as they are not provided with an understanding that the attorneys only goal is to steal all assets and future earnings from litigants. There is no risk warning, no due process… just hidden fees.
Ron Rice says:
August 17, 2012 at 11:42 am (UTC -7)
Dr. Tadros:
I was with Dr. O’Block from 1993-1996 when the ABFE was set up as a handwriting/document examiner organization. Soon he came up with the name: American College of Forensic Examiners (ACFE). I have documents in my possession in support of the allegations below.
I was a Diplomate, Life Member, Chair of the Ethics Committee, Chair of the handwriting profiling committee and National Training Director (Handwriting Profiling) under the various names O’Block called the organization.
Sounds funny now, but from 93-96, with no other reliable “handwriting” organization around – this was a big thing within the handwriting profiling and examination community.
I along with Bob Phillips and Vince Scalise (sic) were the key people who had a credible name and reputation O’Block depended upon to get the ABFE up and running.
WE worked our self nuts trying to establish a reliable organization until we caught him “selling” certifications to certain individuals who were not qualified to be certified as a Handwriting Profiler or Examiner or (at that time) pseudo-Document Examiner.
With O’Block, despite our complaining, it was always the “buck.” Basically, it was an ongoing battle trying to stop him from “selling certificates.” Since Bob lived in PA and Vince in NY and me in MA; it was most difficult to catch O’Block plying his con game. He would tell Bob one thing, Vince another and me.. well, I guess you get the idea.
Long story how the organization was initially structured. Bob Phillips was the first to catch O’Block selling certificates. I have a newspaper article about O’Block selling a certificate to a blue collar worker with no association with the handwriting organization or community. Bob tried to tell me but, I could not see it for whatever reason. Soon, Vince and I caught him and, following other personal reasons, I resigned in 1996. Vince passed on in 1997. Bob had resigned in either 1995 or 1996.
My personal knowledge and experience with O’Block was sobering: he is an unbelievable liar, schemer, sneak and coward. I can assure you that I am not the only one who harbors these convictions.
I may be wrong, but some one had informed me that he has some credentials as a religious preacher. I do not know this for sure. However, if so, it would appear to be a typical final act of a scoundrel.
In closing, here you are in 2012 trying to expose this man and his diploma mill organization. Bob, Vince and I tried during the 93-96 time period. No success.
As long as people can purchase false credentials for $350.00 +, O’Block will continue. I always said it will only be a matter of time before he sells certificates to Certified Forensic Bar Tenders; Certified Forensic Elevator Operators; Certified Forensic Sex Addicts; Certified Forensic Frauds.
Good luck with your on going battle.
Ron Rice
Admin says:
August 17, 2012 at 3:06 pm (UTC -7)
Regarding Ron Rice’s comment, we would like point out that Vince Scalise signed Stephen Doyne’s bogus Diplomate credential. Click HERE to see it.
Ron Rice says:
August 20, 2012 at 9:53 am (UTC -7)
I acknowledge that a Vince Scalise signature is on the Doyne document. However, I challenge the date Vince’s signature was placed on the document, February 1997.
Did Vince actually sign the document in February of 1997 or is it a duplicated signature?” Was Vince aware that this document or any other documents bore his signature during 1997?
Vince died in November of 1997. My associate, Anthony Iantosca, informed me that during early 1997 Vince was suffering from severe medical issues due to his alcoholism. Tony provided certain documents bearing the signature” of Vince signed in 1994 and 1996.
These signatures appear to be almost identical to the February 1997 Vince signature. A scientific impossibility. In order to determine if the February 1997 Scalise signature was actually signed by Vince in February 1997, or placed on the document in an unknown way, the original February 1997 document must be studied and examined for comparison purposes against known Scalise exemplars in my and Tony’s possession..
Further, the questioned February 1997 Scalise signature does not contain any letter stroke characteristics that would suggest that Vince was suffering from any sort of medical problems such as alcoholism. Tony Iantosca, who spent a considerable amount of time with Vince during this time period stated Vince was in pretty bad shape due to his alcoholism.
Tony was with Vince during this time period and stated that Vince and Dr. O’Block were arguing over O’Block issuing certifications without Vince’s knowledge and/or approval.
Tony Iantosca has a wealth of information regarding Vince and O’Block during this time period. None of which is complimentory
Question: Is the Vince Scalise signature on the February 1997 document authentic or a duplicated signature. The legacy and reputation of Vince Scalise demands a truthful answer.
It is also important to recognize that this information also has an effect on my name and business reputation since I was heavily involved in the American Board of Forensic Handwriting Analyst, aka, American Board of Forensic Examiners, aka. American College of Forensic Examiners from 1993-1996.
Ron Rice
Checkmate Forensic Handwriting Examiners
Ron Rice says:
August 20, 2012 at 11:32 am (UTC -7)
My associate Anthony Iantosca phoned me to mention that Vince Scalise WOULD NEVER have signed off or allowed his name to be placed on a certification for any member who was not involved in handwriting examination. Dr. Doyne is a psychologist. Vince did not have the credentials or knowledge to approve or disapprove a licensed psychologist, psychiatrist, medical doctor, nurse, etc.
This would have been, more than likely, the responsibility of Dr. Rosengard, a psychiatrist, or some other highly qualified licensed member of the mental health profession.
The mere fact that a highly respected retired homicide detective, fingerprint and handwriting expert would assume the position of determining the qualifications of a licensed mental health expert is ludicrous. Vince was too intelligent a retired detective to do something this stuped.
This certificate continues to be suspicious.
Ron Rice
Checkmate Forensic Handriting Examiners
Ron Rice says:
August 20, 2012 at 12:42 pm (UTC -7)
1. The Steven E. Doyne, Ph.D. Certification bears the title:
The American College of Forensic Examiners. The Certificate identifies Vincent Scalise as Chairman of the Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors and Cheryl J. Campbell Director of Diplomate Certification.
2. The Steven E. Doyne, Ph.D. designation reads: Diplomate of the American Board of Forensic Examiners. The Certificate identifies Vincent Scalise as Chairman of the Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors and Cheryl J. Campbell as Director of Diplomate Certification.
3. The Certificate bears the date, lower center: February 1997.
4. I have in my possession a copy of the American College of Forensic Examiners Executive Board of Advisors for Professional Standards 1997 Term of Office.
David E. Rosengard, M.D., Ph.D., FACFP, M.P.H.,FACFE, CHAIRMAN
5. American Board of Forensic Examiners Executive Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors 1997 Term of Office.
John E. Douglas, Ed.D., DABF, CHAIRMAN
John Douglas is the renowed retired F.B.I. Profiler.
Vince Scalice is identified as the Chairman of the Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors for both the American College of Forensic Examiners AND The American Board of Forensic Examiners when David R. Rosengard and John E. Douglas were, in fact, the Chairmen.
I am not an attorney. But I do believe this Certificate is highly queastionable.
Ron Rice
Checkmate Forensic Handwriting Examiners
Ron Rice says:
August 27, 2012 at 11:31 am (UTC -7)
I previously mentioned that I challenged the Vince Scalice signature on the Stephen E. Doyne, Ph.D. Certificate. My associate, Tony Iantosca who was also a close friend and confidant of Vince, stated it is his belief that the Vince Scalice signature on the Doyne document is a “stamped impression.” Possibly.
According to Tony, Vince resigned as the Chairman of the Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors in 1996 due to his constant mistrust and arguing with O’Block over the issuing of certificates behind Vince’s back.
Should the Doyne certificate be all it is made out to be, would it not have made perfect sense and credible to have the 1997 Term of Office Executive Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors Chairman John E. Douglas sign the document?
I have in my possession the following:
K1. A faxed copy of an ABFE certificate to Anthony Iantosca dated 6/30/94.
Document bears the signature of Vincent J. Scalice. Signature is an
exact copy of the Scalice signature on the 1997 certificate issued to
Dr. Doyne.
K2. A faxed copy of an ABFE certificate (Diplomate) to Anthony Iantosca
dated 12/20/94. Document bears my signature (authentic) and, once
again, an exact copy of the Scalice signature as that found on the 1997
certificate issued to Dr. Doyne.
K3. A faxed copy of a letter created by Vince Scalice regarding Anthony
Iantosca, per Tony’s recollection, in October of 1995. Document bears,
once again, an exact copy of the Scalice signature as found on the 1997
certificate issued to Dr. Doyne.
Q1. A copy of the certificate issued to Dr. Doyne. Amazingly, the signature of
Vince Scalice is exactly the same as the Scalice signature found in
Exhibits K1, K2 and K3.
As stated above, Tony and I believe that Vince would never had signed the Doyne document willingly and knowingly.
It is a scientific fact that no one signs his/her name the same way twice. This is the basic foundation of Forensic Handwriting Examination. In order for the above identified documents to bear an exact signature of Vince Scalice from 1994-1997 can only be done by some form of mechanical means (i.e. computer or stamp).
It would appear that Dr. Doyne has been placed in an embarrassing position. Any qualified Handwriting Examiner (NOT a pseudo-Document Examiner or member of any pseudo-Document Examiner Association) would have one heck of a time proving my challenge wrong.
Er…. With all the frauds out there, I am sure that “certain” people will have no problem obtaining an opinion that I am wrong. Amazing what $350.00 will buy you.
Zoe de Katz to all you….
Ron Rice
Checkmate Forensic Handwriting Examiners
Anthony J. Iantosca says:
August 28, 2012 at 3:02 am (UTC -7)
My associate Ron Rice is correct in the state of Vince’s health during that time period but Vince’s health was due to his Emphysema from smoking and the use of Ninhydrin spray he used in the analysis of latent fingerprints.
Vince was in a great deal of pain in the last year of his life.
In 1997 Vince was not the Chairman of the board for the American Board of Forensic Examiners or The American College of Forensic Examiners. Vincent Scalice would have never signed a document that was not in his area of expertise. I was with Vince the last four years of his life. Vincent Scalice, was an Internationally known Forensic Expert. He specialized in Latent Fingerprint Classification, Homicide Reconstruction and Forensic Document Examination. Mr. Scalice has been a Consultant Member of the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations which was responsible for the investigations of the deaths of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. I will not have Vince’s name dragged through the mud. If anyone has any questions please feel free to contact me.
Anthony J. Iantosca
Anthony J. Iantosca says:
August 28, 2012 at 4:53 am (UTC -7)
Since we are on the subject of the American Board of Forensic Examiners. I can tell you point blank that in the early years of this organization it was not giving certifications to Cats, Dogs, Mice or Gerbils . Starting with Vincent J. Scalice, If it was not for Vince this origination would not even exist along with Ronald H. Rice and Robert Philips just to name a few. I was a member when it was called The American Board of Forensic Handwriting Analysis Inc. My membership number is #107. Now to be looked at, as class clowns, because some nit-wit certified a Cat. Vincent J. Scalice. Vince passed away on the 25th of November 1997. I am alive and kicking, so if anyone thinks they are going to use Vincent J. Scalice as a scape goat for this non sense you had better think again.
Ron Rice says:
August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm (UTC -7)
I have received phone call’s and emails from certain professional people who are most interested in my real and personal knowledge about Dr. O’Block and the ABFHA, aka, ABFE, aka, ACFE, from 1993-1996.
In the mean time two additional (certification) documents have been received from Anthony Iantosca (each) bearing the exact same signature of David E. Rosengard, M.D., PhD. Chairman, American College of Forensic Examiners dated July 1997 and the second Valid to July 1999 respectively. Further, the signature of Cheryl J. Campbell, BCA, Deputy Director found on the second certificate (Valid to July 1999) is exactly the same as the Cheryl J. Campbell Director of Diplomate Certification signature found on the Doyne certificate.
Appears, O’Block had been issuing certificates with mechanical generated signatures of Scalice, Rosengard and Campbell. I know for a fact that Vince did not sign certain certificates that bear his name. If he did know and approve why would he have been calling O’Block down on the certificates issued without his knowledge or approval?
It is a true fact that Bob Phillips, Vince Scalice and I detected, found, identified, uncovered, discovered or whatever other “verb” you wish to use during the 93-96 and, for Vince, 1997 period, that O’Block was issuing certificates without the knowledge and/or approval of we three.
I know it is a true fact that Bob Phillips was constantly calling O’Block down on this and, out of sheer frustration, resigned. Vince also continued to catch O’Block and when I caught O’Block red handed granting a certification to a unqualified woman and called him down on this he stated (as God is my witness) I don’t want to give her her money back ($150.00). I won’t recertify her next year. To this day, this woman testify’s in court as a Board Certified Document Examiner by the American Board of Forensic Examiners (ABFE) in 1994. This pseudo-document examiner/woman was rejected by me AND Vince Scalice because she was working fulll time as an executive secretary and using handwriting analysis as a hobby.
I have all the necessary documentation! This pseudo-document examiner who claims to be able to perform, for example, ink differentiation, and obtained studies in Document Examination and Court Preparation through the New England Association of Evidential Examiners of which she is a “founder,” is only one of many pseudo-document examiners certified through the ABFE.
These “frauds” are perpetrating a fraud upon the courts, clients and attorneys due to their lack of knowledge.
This is only the tip of the iceberg. More of this later.
Who is this guy Ron Rice?
Learn about handwriting Behavioral Profiling Through Written Communication and Forensic Handwriting Examination from the published author of the most comprehensive education, training and certification courses available in the country, Ron Rice. Many doctors of various disciplines communicated with me and we became friends.
Ron Rice has about 19 college credits and over 40 years of self study in graduate level publications. I also have extensive education, training and certification in Basic, Advanced and Forensic Hypnotherapy and have testified in criminal court regarding rape and was called upon by the MA state police regarding a kidnapping and homicide investigation via reference from a psychiatric hospital.
Should anyone with a vested interest in this issue require more information, please contact me. I will save you time in your search for “mud.” Better law firms and attorneys than some of you have tried and failed.
Zoe de Katz to you…
Ron Rice
Checkmate Forensic Handwriting Examiners
Anthony J. Iantosca says:
August 31, 2012 at 7:59 am (UTC -7)
I faxed my associate Ron Rice a certificate I found in the Forensic Examiner Volume 5 numbers 11 & 12 dated November/December 1996. On page 21 there is a new redesigned certificate available to members who would like to replace their older certificates. It bears the name of John Smith, M.D. Diplomate of the American Board of Forensic Examiners. Signed Vincent J. Scalice Chairman of the Board of Scientific and Technical Advisors and Cheryl J. Campbell Director of Certification. Number 99999 December 1996. The signatures are an exact duplicate of the four (4) other signatures/documents I have in my possession. No one can sign their name the exact same way twice, I have five(5) documents from 1994-1997 with the exact same signatures that is scientifically impossible . Vincent J. Scalice never signed or knowingly allowed his name to be placed or stamped on the Stephen Doyne certificate. Vince was not a Medical Doctor.
Anthony J. Iantosca